<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Racism Vs. Sexism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mindfeck.com/racism-vs-sexism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mindfeck.com/racism-vs-sexism/</link>
	<description>Funny videos, comics, articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:04:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarrod</title>
		<link>http://www.mindfeck.com/racism-vs-sexism/comment-page-1/#comment-10933</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindfeck.info/racism-vs-sexism/#comment-10933</guid>
		<description>This is one of the most ridiculous articles I have ever read. Honestly it doesn&#039;t really even deserve a response; any educated reader would automatically dismiss this as crap. It basically comes down to your assumption that Hillary would spend an hour a day putting on makeup, therefore she would be a bad president. WOW...you could of summed that up in one sentence. Instead, you bored us with a terribly written bundle of crap for which we are all dumber having read.

Don&#039;t quit your day job.

Thanks. A$$.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the most ridiculous articles I have ever read. Honestly it doesn&#8217;t really even deserve a response; any educated reader would automatically dismiss this as crap. It basically comes down to your assumption that Hillary would spend an hour a day putting on makeup, therefore she would be a bad president. WOW&#8230;you could of summed that up in one sentence. Instead, you bored us with a terribly written bundle of crap for which we are all dumber having read.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t quit your day job.</p>
<p>Thanks. A$$.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Socrates</title>
		<link>http://www.mindfeck.com/racism-vs-sexism/comment-page-1/#comment-10930</link>
		<dc:creator>Socrates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindfeck.info/racism-vs-sexism/#comment-10930</guid>
		<description>Aristotle once said, &quot;It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.&quot;

Why can&#039;t we all be human</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aristotle once said, &#8220;It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t we all be human</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.mindfeck.com/racism-vs-sexism/comment-page-1/#comment-8956</link>
		<dc:creator>Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 06:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindfeck.info/racism-vs-sexism/#comment-8956</guid>
		<description>A woman interviewed (it aired on CNN I think) in front of a trailer said, when asked about Hilliary running, &quot;WOMEN BELONG AT HOME!&quot;  Or something close.  

Did anyone see or hear, &quot;BLACK PEOPLE BELONG IN THE COTTON FIELD&quot; ?  I sure didn&#039;t!  Of course there are people who think that and, along with the trailer park woman, are willfully ignorant.  However, that type of racist comment would NEVER have aired on a national network, BUT the sexist one did.  

Points being: 
1) Even women are still sexist against women (or just brainwashed).  That creates a loose/loose.  I&#039;ve never heard a black person (African America, South African, British-you name it) say that black people belong in the cotton field (or insert the equal scenario depending on the country).

2) We are ALL influenced by race AND gender (although that doesn&#039;t have to mean racist or sexist) and we will always will be a country influenced by such...Or at least until we start a proactive educating of people when they are small children.   

3) Look at the history of our country - black men won the right to vote before white women.  Both were wrong to not allow, but historically we have a Puritan value system.  Gender roles were/still are defined.  That trumps race any day.  We are really old fashioned (as a whole/the majority) and definitely more racist/sexist/anything-ist, than American.  Case in point=the current Miss CA comment about gay marriage. 

Funny thing is this:  John McCain would have prob made a decent president and prob would have won (given his military service, etc) if he hadn&#039;t been running right after the worst 8 years in American History with a white male Republican &quot;leading&quot; AND if he&#039;d been running against a white male Democrat/or other.  The country was primed for ANYONE BUT a white male.  (If you&#039;re a white man, you&#039;re getting the backlash/retaliation from centuries of white male domination/abuse. Doesn&#039;t matter if you are the most un-racist, un-sexist person out there. Anyway, white males still dominate, number-wise, everything but stripping, prostitution, basketball, football, and massage therapy.)

(No I didn&#039;t vote for McCain, or Obama.  I voted for Ron Paul. Because he was a gynecologist.  If you do that job everyday, you can prob do anything.)

The comment on makeup and hair is unfounded too (unless you are willfully ignorant).  I know a woman who always looks hot and well put together.  She spends 10-15 min getting dressed, putting on makeup and fixing her hair.  I know a guy (straight actually) with a 5-step process for his hair alone.  This type of argument is stereotype driven, just like black people are stupid.  Sure some of them are stupid, and some women do belong in the home...but being black or being a woman isn&#039;t the reason why.  And really, out of the people I know, there&#039;s a much larger percent of stupid white males who shouldn&#039;t ever be allowed to procreate!  But they do anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A woman interviewed (it aired on CNN I think) in front of a trailer said, when asked about Hilliary running, &#8220;WOMEN BELONG AT HOME!&#8221;  Or something close.  </p>
<p>Did anyone see or hear, &#8220;BLACK PEOPLE BELONG IN THE COTTON FIELD&#8221; ?  I sure didn&#8217;t!  Of course there are people who think that and, along with the trailer park woman, are willfully ignorant.  However, that type of racist comment would NEVER have aired on a national network, BUT the sexist one did.  </p>
<p>Points being:<br />
1) Even women are still sexist against women (or just brainwashed).  That creates a loose/loose.  I&#8217;ve never heard a black person (African America, South African, British-you name it) say that black people belong in the cotton field (or insert the equal scenario depending on the country).</p>
<p>2) We are ALL influenced by race AND gender (although that doesn&#8217;t have to mean racist or sexist) and we will always will be a country influenced by such&#8230;Or at least until we start a proactive educating of people when they are small children.   </p>
<p>3) Look at the history of our country &#8211; black men won the right to vote before white women.  Both were wrong to not allow, but historically we have a Puritan value system.  Gender roles were/still are defined.  That trumps race any day.  We are really old fashioned (as a whole/the majority) and definitely more racist/sexist/anything-ist, than American.  Case in point=the current Miss CA comment about gay marriage. </p>
<p>Funny thing is this:  John McCain would have prob made a decent president and prob would have won (given his military service, etc) if he hadn&#8217;t been running right after the worst 8 years in American History with a white male Republican &#8220;leading&#8221; AND if he&#8217;d been running against a white male Democrat/or other.  The country was primed for ANYONE BUT a white male.  (If you&#8217;re a white man, you&#8217;re getting the backlash/retaliation from centuries of white male domination/abuse. Doesn&#8217;t matter if you are the most un-racist, un-sexist person out there. Anyway, white males still dominate, number-wise, everything but stripping, prostitution, basketball, football, and massage therapy.)</p>
<p>(No I didn&#8217;t vote for McCain, or Obama.  I voted for Ron Paul. Because he was a gynecologist.  If you do that job everyday, you can prob do anything.)</p>
<p>The comment on makeup and hair is unfounded too (unless you are willfully ignorant).  I know a woman who always looks hot and well put together.  She spends 10-15 min getting dressed, putting on makeup and fixing her hair.  I know a guy (straight actually) with a 5-step process for his hair alone.  This type of argument is stereotype driven, just like black people are stupid.  Sure some of them are stupid, and some women do belong in the home&#8230;but being black or being a woman isn&#8217;t the reason why.  And really, out of the people I know, there&#8217;s a much larger percent of stupid white males who shouldn&#8217;t ever be allowed to procreate!  But they do anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.mindfeck.com/racism-vs-sexism/comment-page-1/#comment-2250</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 23:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindfeck.info/racism-vs-sexism/#comment-2250</guid>
		<description>you suck!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you suck!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.mindfeck.com/racism-vs-sexism/comment-page-1/#comment-2245</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 22:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindfeck.info/racism-vs-sexism/#comment-2245</guid>
		<description>This is one of the worst articles that I&#039;ve ever read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the worst articles that I&#8217;ve ever read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

